There are just too many people in the country, and I propose removing them as they came here - last one in, first one out.  I don't care if they have skills or professions, and this is NOT based on politics or religion.  The FACT is that we have far too many people in the UK, and they need to leave.  This programme would have to be part of a much larger re-organisation of the UK, from the way we employ people to state benefits.  Because, oddly, we need to encourage childbirth.  Long-term, there aren't enough of the young to look after the old.  Importing people wouldn't be so bad if we were bringing in thousands and thousands of children, but we're importing adults, adults who will need care in just a few decades.  Who will care for them?  The insane twats on the Left think we need to import even more people to look after them!  So we would be in an endless cycle of importing people to look after those already imported.  Where does that lead?

Our benefit system encourages immigration.  No country can exist for very long if it has both an open-border system and unregulated welfare benefits.  You can come here and claim benefits immediately, despite never paying in.  This is an obvious enticement to come to the UK.  Some 4 million of the 12 million since 2020 have come from Europe - countries that are far from poverty-stricken and the cesspits of Africa.  These people have come here for work and to build a better life for themselves.  I get it, who wouldn't want to do that?  And I have met MANY of them, and they are largely very nice people - and they love it here.  Of course they do!  But we are just too small to accommodate them, and they (sadly, in many cases) have to leave.  They must adapt their own countries to be as prosperous as ours, and with the same opportunities for living a comfortable life.  They must return and mould their country into something they require.

I recently had cause to contact my GP surgery, as I had a lump under my arm.  At 8.00 in the morning when they open, I phoned.  It immediately went to an answer-service (such is the NHS) as I was the 28th in the queue...at the opening time.  They called me back to say that they simply hadn't any available appointments that day at all.  I asked what I should do and they said to call back the next day...but it could be the same again.  I had to pay £150 and go a private surgery, instead.  I have paid into the NHS for over 50 years, and this is what it has come to.  This is not due to the incredible mismanagement of the NHS - that's bad enough - but due to the sheer number of people it is having to deal with - an additional 2,100 people every day.  This is 2,100 extra people on the roads, 2,100 extra people using our water supplies, 2,100 extra people needing electricity and gas, 2,100 extra people needing schools, help, advice, and a myriad of other services...EVERY DAY.  It's 15,000 extra people A WEEK.  This is not sustainable, obviously - it is very basic mathematics.  You can't carry on adding water to a bucket forever.  And the point you should take away from this is that the 2,100 people a day figure is the government's statistics...and we all know we can trust that, right?  The UK Home Office has admitted that it has no idea whatsoever how many people actually come into the UK.  It has better stats on how many people leave!  So what, what if it's actually 2,500 people a day?  It makes little difference because we are at breaking point right now whatever the number.  We have to stop letting ANYONE in today, but we must start deporting tomorrow.

We need to reduce our population to a sustainable number - one we can cope perfectly well with.  The population is said to be 70 million at present.  Some organisations put it much higher than that.  Realistically, we would do well to drop it to between 60 and 65 million...and quickly.  In the future, this will happen naturally, as births decrease.  But our number of aged will increase.  We need young to take care of old.  So all of this needs to be coupled with a major plan, the likes of which this country, or perhaps any country, has never seen.  We need to encourage our 15 year-old schoolgirls to want to become nurses (and replace the deported 'Filipinos'!).  We would only do that by promising a starting salary of £30,000 for example WITH a flat to live in on the hospital site (remember that?).  That would mean raised taxation to pay for it.  However, and perhaps oddly for someone considered 'right-wing', I propose taxation of the very rich.  It is perhaps the only thing I have in common with those on the Left of politics.  If a dying mother or father leaves a small fortune to their children, then I think it's only fair that a portion of it should be subject to tax - inheritance tax.  Yes, I agree with it.  I would set it at £500,000 for individuals, and after that, tax it at 90%.  So a mother dies and leaves £10 million in wealth (not actual funds) to her three children.  They would only be allowed £500,000 each tax-free.  The remaining £8.5 million would be taxed at 90% - meaning that £9 million would go to the government, and £1 million would go back to the estate.  That's still an additional £333,333 back to the surviving children ON TOP OF the £500,000 they had tax-free.  So it's still very generous.  It must be remembered that inheritance is unearned income.  You have acquired it through nothing you have done.  The more children you have, the less goes to the government upon your death, so another incentive to have children.

I would also do something about gift taxation.  A billionaire is able to gift his/her children (again) unearned income throughout his/her life.  This way, billions and billions of pounds gets handed down to children, and perpetuates an inequality in our society.  It's wrong.  In my opinion, there are far too many people in the UK with obscene amounts of money - wealth.  As I said, I sound like some communist leftie nutter, but it is so.  Having £1 million in wealth isn't what it used to be.  Your home could easily be worth £1 million without you being considered wealthy.  However, there are limits.  Having a £100 million pound home means you ARE wealthy!  It's just too much.  Even a £10 million home is almost everyone's dream.  So where do we draw a line?  If you are worth £1 billion then you are part of a club of around 160 people in the UK.  This is way too much for one person to have.  It really is obscene.  I would tax that - both on income* and on actual wealth.  I would reduce it considerably no matter on whether it was earned or inherited.

*If you have considerable wealth, you will earn money on it - you can't fail to do so unless you are the world's worst investor.  £10 million invested at 5% in anything would earn you £500,000 every year in interest.  That really is money for nothing.  You've done nothing more than stuck your £10 million in an account.  You could earn even more if you invest it cleverly.

Anyway, I have drifted off from our need to deport people.  We need to get this country back on an even keel in so many ways.  So much needs to change, from our legal system to our politics.  We need to be more representative - people need better democracy than the excuse for the one we have.  Look how those in power sought to alter the Brexit vote - a democratic vote by the people.  Even now, we don't have a real Brexit.  If you are/were a 'remainer' then you probably approve of that, but remember that it was the will of the people.  If we don't have at least the pathetic democracy that we currently have, then we have nothing at all.  It doesn't matter if you were pro or anti EU, the fact is that those in power tried to subvert the decision by the people.  It bordered on scary, as it meant that we don't have any real democracy - and we don't!  Despite who you vote for, that MP will do what he/she wants when they get into power - they won't consult you.  That has to change.  We need referendum government.

But all this starts with a 'smaller' country.  WE NEED TO DEPORT A MINIMUM OF 6 MILLION PEOPLE.  The population of Britain just 25 years ago (2000) was 60 million.  That is what we perhaps should be aiming for, so I would name the campaign, 'Project 2000'.  In reality, of course, no government is going to do it.  Even Nigel Farage won't go ahead with his 600,000 deportation programme (one tenth of my figure).  He will flip flop on it.  We need a 'right-wing' government, or rather, a sensible government which has clear aims on where the UK should be heading.  As we are, we're heading for disaster.